<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18876">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> PREACHING RESOURCES FOR JANUARY 31 - Luke 4:21-30 - Part
2B</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT color=black size=4
face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><BR><FONT size=4><FONT size=5>PREACHING
RESOURCES FOR JANUARY 31 </FONT><FONT size=4>(7 of the 70 plus preaching
resources available at GoodPreacher.com for this Sunday)</FONT><FONT
size=5>:<BR><BR></FONT><FONT size=4><STRONG>PASTORAL IMPLICATIONS: Luke
4:21-30<BR><BR></STRONG>Luke recounts in this passage a dramatic reversal of
fortune for Jesus who suddenly is no longer the darling of the Nazareth crowd;
Jesus becomes instead the goat. In fact, Jesus so alienates the homefolks that
they want to stone him by throwing him onto the rocks below a precipice. Such a
punishment is usually reserved for blasphemers and adulterers.<BR><BR>The
question the text begs is this: How do we account for such murderous rage on the
part of Jesus’ once friendly neighbors? First, Jesus self-defines.
Self-definition is a family therapy term that expresses a certain posture of
over-againstness or self-differentiation from the prevailing family system. The
system’s reaction is most often acute. In fact, family therapists call it an
“acute phase” where the system tries to pressure the person who is defining
herself in opposition to the system to return to her “normal” position. The
renegade member has disturbed the homeostasic equilibrium of the system and must
be either recouped or expelled. If the offense is significant to the group’s
cohesiveness or identity, then expulsion is the only option.<BR><BR>Further, by
stealing the crowd’s criticism that he is not performing miracles in Nazareth as
he did in Capernaum, Jesus defines himself not as a miracle-worker, but as a
messiah. He also criticizes their hometown resistance to his prophetic mission
as the reason for his not being able to do miracles. This self-definition in
itself is enough to provoke censure and expulsion, but Jesus courts disaster by
allying himself with outsiders who received God’s favor as non-Jews. In so
doing, Jesus has wounded the Nazareth crowd narcissistically, i.e., at the core
of their being, at how they represent themselves to themselves, at the level of
their self-image.<BR><BR>Such narcissistic wounding is unforgiveable. Their
narcissism, their self-elevation and self-inflation as God’s chosen people, is
punctured by Jesus’ skillful use of the stories of Naaman the Syrian and the
widow of Zarephtah. For the elite there is little value in being God’s chosen if
you cannot see yourself as specially endowed and favored. The only recourse is
psychological annihilation (murder). The people of Nazareth could well have
chosen to shun or ignore Jesus, to declare him a pariah, and to ostracize him
along with the lepers, the dispossessed, and the non-Jews. But apparently, their
wound is so deep that only murder will heal their injury. Possibly, because they
do not have ecclesiastical sanction for murdering Jesus, they allow him to pass.
Clearly this story represents a foreshadowing of Jesus’ eventual trial and
death.<BR><BR>From a pastoral perspective this passage may serve as a cautionary
tale for the church and its prophetic ministry. Our culture tends to tolerate
many Christian denominations’ claim of exclusive entre to God through Jesus
Christ. For some reason the cultural despisers of religion do not flinch at this
ideologically extreme statement. Probably this is because it is voiced by people
who are able to compartmentalize their lives into worldly endeavors to secure
themselves and those they love and religious practices that produce conforming
cogs for the machinery of private enterprise. As long as religious or Christian
people fit with the culture in terms of its consumption goods and its
involvement in leisure activities, the non-religious culture deigns to accept
faith assertions as quaint, archaic, and/or irrelevant. which they plan to throw
him.<BR><BR>The preacher might work with the insight that this text records one
of the first acts of Jesus’ ministry, yet it also anticipates the end of his
earthly life: he will be rejected by his own people and some will desire to kill
him. The text anticipates his resurrection in the curious yet powerful final
verse that indicates how little power people have over him, “But he passed
through the midst of them and went on his way.” Where does he go? Because of
their rejection of him, because they are offended that God’s saving grace is for
all people, he goes from his own people to take his message to the Gentiles. He
is able to escape because he remains “filled with the power of the Spirit”
(4:14).<BR><BR>Revelation is always two-way, it must be given and it must be
received. Revelation that is not received is not yet revelation. The Word
continues to go where it will be heard and received. Many of us would love to be
able to control God, to have God save those we think should be saved, love just
the loveable, and forgive only the forgivable. Yet God is sovereign and God’s
ways are not ours. Those people who are least worthy of being saved are included
in those God came to save. Those who are least loveable because of how they
behave or what they have done, remain precious children in God’s sight, worthy
of redemption. Christ died not just for what is forgivable, but for what is
seemingly unforgivable.<BR><BR>It is easy for us to be like the people of
Nazareth, offended that the grace of God might extend to some we might consider
as unworthy. Still, we need to remember that at one time we were the unworthy,
and the word came to us and abides in and with us. Even our rejection of the
Word does not preclude what God can do.<BR><BR>Paul Scott
Wilson<BR><BR><BR></FONT></FONT>
<DIV style="CLEAR: both"></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>