<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19019">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=4><STRONG><FONT color=#33cc00 size=5
face="Microsoft Sans Serif">Free Resource from
GoodPreacher.com<BR></FONT></STRONG>
<DIV align=center><BR></DIV>
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2 width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR><STRONG><FONT color=#33cc00 size=5
face="Microsoft Sans Serif"></FONT></STRONG></TR>
<TR><STRONG><FONT color=#33cc00 size=5
face="Microsoft Sans Serif"></FONT></STRONG></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<DIV align=center><BIG><STRONG><FONT color=#33cc00 size=5
face="Microsoft Sans Serif"></FONT></STRONG></BIG></DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT
size=4><STRONG>Matthew 4:1-11</STRONG></FONT></FONT>
<P align=justify><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=4>For some time now, I have been
puzzled by the traditional Christian doctrine that Jesus was sinless, even
though he was a real human being. My question is not so much whether this is
true, but what it actually means. Can one be human at all without missing the
mark in some sense at least? The puzzle is compounded when I re-read the story
of Jesus’ temptations by Satan. Was Jesus really tempted or is this all a
theatrical performance? Did Jesus have to struggle with himself so as not to
give in to Satan’s allure or is the outcome never in doubt to begin with? I
suppose the belief that Jesus was not only "fully human" but also "fully divine"
answers the question for itself. Insofar as Jesus was divine, there is no
problem in understanding how he could overcome temptations to which the rest of
us succumb. But insofar as Jesus is really human and not merely nominally so,
the question is more difficult. <BR></FONT></FONT></P>
<P align=justify><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=4>The Letter to the Hebrews affirms
that Jesus was not someone "unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one
who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sinning" (Heb
4:15). What does it mean to be tempted without sinning? I suppose it all depends
on how "temptation" and "sin" are defined. One could imagine being in dire
financial straits and tempted to cheat the IRS or even to rob a bank and yet
refrain from executing the deed for fear of imprisonment. Is that an example of
what it means to be tempted yet without sinning? Or what about the temptation to
pick up a cigarette even though I know it is unhealthy? Have I refrained from
sin by not choosing the guilty pleasure that I know would be mine if I were to
light up? What if I am tempted to rail at an insufferable colleague at work but
contain my impulse because I know my angry words will be hurtful? We often hear
people say that a piece of cake looks tempting (or even "sinfully delicious")
but choose not to indulge in eating it either because they are already full or
because they are dieting. In these examples, the temptation refers to the inner
state of feeling when the mind contemplates doing something, whereas sin refers
to the act or deed. Yet these examples show that our use of the words
"temptation" and "sin" can be stretched to cover so much ground that their
meaning is imprecise. Not all temptations are temptations to commit crimes or
acts of immorality. Surely Jesus must have been tempted by the idea of eating
bread after forty days of fasting! But this temptation was not of a moral
nature. When we ask what it means to say that Jesus was tempted and yet without
sin, we have to restrict the meanings of temptation and sin to religious and
moral matters.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P align=justify><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=4>In the classical Christian
tradition sin has been defined as being more than merely deeds or acts. It also
refers to the intention or underlying desire behind sinful acts. Shortly after
the story of Jesus’ temptation in Matthew’s gospel, we read in the Sermon on the
Mount that anger is akin to murder (Mt 5:22). Then we are told that a lustful
thought is a form of adultery (Mt 5:28). These texts lead me to wonder what it
means to say that Jesus was really tempted "in every respect…as we are, yet
without sinning." Was Jesus tempted to feel anger but never felt it? Was Jesus
tempted to feel sexual attraction but never felt it? If Jesus felt neither anger
nor desire, how could he know what they are? Someone with no first-hand
experience of either feeling would hardly be in a position "to sympathize with
our weaknesses." Still, if Jesus did share in these common human feelings, must
we conclude that they are always temptations to do something wrong? Perhaps we
should view these examples from the Sermon on the Mount as hyperbolic, pointing
to the truth that anger is the source of murder and that lust is the source of
sexual immorality. But anger can also inspire efforts to rectify situations of
injustice and sexual desire can lead to genuine love as in a marriage. In other
words, deeds or actions spring from feelings or affections and our moral
character is as much about how we respond to our feelings as it is about the
acts we commit.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P align=justify><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=4>The temptations to which Jesus is
subjected by Satan are not the stuff of everyday life: changing stones into
bread, jumping off a building in order to be rescued by angels, and worshipping
Satan. Jesus is not dealing with ordinary human temptations but rather with
temptations arising from his divine status ("If you are the Son of God…"). Jesus
resists the temptations to be a certain kind of messiah ("king" or "lord" of the
world). Unlike Satan who is a fallen angel, Jesus remains obedient to God.
Interestingly, Satan tries to mislead Jesus by quoting from scripture, but Jesus
knows his Bible too well to be seduced by bad hermeneutics. When we try to
understand the temptation narrative from the point of view of Jesus’
crucifixion, we can easily perceive that Jesus was not the kind of messiah who
subdued evil through an overt display of supernatural power but only through
humble obedience to God, even unto death (Phil 2:8). Surely Jesus was tempted to
find a way to avoid the pain of the cross (Mt 26:39). Who wouldn’t be? The early
church’s insistence upon Jesus’ sinless nature was, in part, an attempt to
defend him against the charge that he deserved his punishment by committing a
crime (Mt 27:4). Moreover, his death was understood as an atonement for the sins
of others, so it was necessary to view him as a sacrifice "without blemish" (Heb
9:14).</FONT></FONT></P>
<P align=justify><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=4>Whether Jesus was, in fact,
sinless is a question that we cannot answer. Even if we could agree on what we
meant by sin, we do not know everything Jesus did in his life, and we are
certainly not in a position to ascertain his every thought and feeling. But we
should not allow the belief in his divinity to minimize his real humanity, which
includes all the temptations with which persons struggle in life. Perhaps the
surest thing we can say is that the New Testament presents us with a portrait of
a person whose dominant devotion was to God amid trials, tribulations,
pressures, and even real temptations. Clearly, the primary purpose of this
portrayal is not to report past history but to form our moral and spiritual
character in a manner appropriate to a Christian understanding of life before
God. We can allow ourselves to be informed (in the sense of "shaped" or
"molded") by this portrait of Jesus as steadfast and faithful to God’s purposes,
in spite of temptations.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P align=justify><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=4>Paul E. Capetz</FONT></FONT></P>
<P style="MARGIN-TOP: 0pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt" align=center><FONT size=3><FONT
face="Microsoft
Sans Serif"><B><BR></B></FONT></FONT><A
href="http://www.goodpreacher.com/">GoodPreacher.com</A></P>
<P style="MARGIN-TOP: 0pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt" align=center>PO Box 843 | Amelia,
VA 23002<BR></P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>